Pre-war
1914
Outbreak of the war
1915
1916
1917
1918
End of the war
Post-war

Para Pacem – an Austrian peace movement with a difference

Shortly before the outbreak of the First World War, Adolf Müller, former member of the Austrian Peace Society, founded his own association, the Österreichischer Verband für allgemeine Völkerverständigung “Para Pacem”. It evolved after the war into the Österreichische Völkerbundliga [Austrian League of Nations], which in 1945 became the Österreichische Liga für die Vereinten Nationen [Austrian United Nations Association].

According to its statutes it called for the settlement of conflicts among nations by arbitration and set itself the aim of implementing this in practice. It was not interested in considering the theoretical aspects or programmes of pacifist movements but, according to the historian Christoph Gütermann, primarily in implementing practical initiatives and projects – for example through the publication of lectures, brochures and books, the founding of local and youth groups, and special departments dealing with education and hygiene. In this way it differed from the Austrian Peace Society led by Bertha von Suttner and Alfred H. Fried, with whom Adolf Müller had a tense relationship.

Unlike the Austrian Peace Society, which was “suspended for the duration of the war”, Para Pacem was able for the most part to continue its activities. Between 1915 and 1917 it even managed to publish six issues of its mouthpiece, also called Para Pacem. In view of the rigorous censorship, however, the opinions had to be expressed in highly cautious terms. The reaction to these publications was split: the association was able to increase its membership as a result, but Para Pacem’s initiatives also met with criticism, as it was feared that its plea for understanding among nations could be interpreted by enemy powers as an expression of weakness.

Gütermann writes that in 1916 Para Pacem conducted a survey to address the question of whether it is “desirable and timely to take a stand now against efforts to obstruct or even prevent cooperation between nations after peace has been declared” to which thirty-four people submitted written replies. Contributors included Heinrich Lammasch, who was also honorary president of the association, and the two board members Josef Schumpeter and Ignaz Seipel. The latter wrote: “I am conducting a continuous campaign against the artificial incitement of bitterness towards members of foreign nations and advocate the maintenance of a cultural community among European nations.”

Translation: Nick Somers

 

 

Bibliografie 

Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 13–132

 

Quotes:

„It evolved after the war  …“ : Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 37

„[…] primarily in implementing practical initiatives …“: Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 50

„[…] to publish six issues …“: Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 52

„The reaction to these publications …“: Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 53

„desirable and timely to take a stand now ...“: Para Pacem,  Heft 2/3, 4–26, quoted from: Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 53

„I am conducting a continuous campaign ...“: Para Pacem, Heft 2/3, 4–26, quoted from:Gütermann, Christoph: Die Geschichte der österreichischen Friedensbewegung 1891–1985, in: Manfried Rauchensteiner (Hrsg.): Überlegungen zum Frieden, Wien 1987, 54

Contents related to this chapter

Aspects

  • Aspect

    Discontent

    The longer the war lasted, the more disagreement was voiced by representatives of the Austrian peace and women’s movements and also by sections of the Austro‑Hungarian population. They became increasingly tired of the war, reflected in strikes and hunger riots and in mass desertions by front soldiers towards the end of the war.

Persons, Objects & Events

  • Person

    Ignaz Seipel

    Ignaz Seipel was a theologist, prelate and Christian Socialist politician. During the First World War he was Minister of Social Welfare in the ‘Lammasch cabinet’.

  • Object

    For peace

    The face on the 1000-schilling note is Bertha von Suttner, probably the most famous representative of the Austrian peace movement. During the First World War there were lots of people and groups who followed her example and protested against the war and in favour of peace. Although they had little influence, their advocacy of peace was particularly courageous in view of the prevailing and controlling censorship.